I am in the process of reading Ron Kennedy's informative
book "Reclaiming Liberty." Ron does a rather detailed job
of explaining where we are in this countr and then he
lists a whole batch of areas, hot-button issues if you
will, that we need to begin to deal with if ever our
liberty is to be reclaimed. In the book Ron deals with
social security, public (government) schools, private
property, racial issues, and the Supreme Court, to mention
some of them.
In each instance he lists the problems caused by
government in these areas and then outlines what we need
to begin to do to correct the problem.
Ron deals also with the conservative failures of the
past century and how, in spite of the rhetoric the
conservatives hand out to folks at election time, all they
really end up doing is conserving the programs the
liberals pushed a few years ago and calling that
conservatism. And there is no need to think that will
change anytime soon. It works, it gets votes, so why
switch? In relation to the "conservatives"--so called, Ron
notes on page 17 that: "In America's contemporary
political system, ideas such as states' rights, a
constitutionally limited federal government, local
control, and individual liberty are dead! Southern
conservatives have spent the last century trying to
preserve a political system that no longer exists. To make
matters worse, liberals have known this all along, while
our contemporary conservative leaders are either too
foolish to recognize it or too cowardly to admit it." Ron
labels them as "the keepers of an extinguished flame."
Can't argue with him there.
He continues: "By the end of the twentieth century, no
'right thinking' conservative would be found advocating a
return to the original constitutional federalism where the
federal government was secondary and state and local
control of limited government was primary." He noted that
today's "neoconservatives" have only one thing in
mind--"control of the Federal Empire"--and they couldn't
care a rip about the "Republic of Republics as created by
the Founding Fathers."
Ron has again observed: "Thus we have witnessed in our
lifetime the movement of conservatives from opposing
socializing schemes to adopting them, provided this would
help them win political office. In the twentieth century
conservatives exchanged principles for the idea that the
end justifies the means. In so doing, conservative leaders
have become willing collaborators of the liberals, as
together they move America away from the principles of
liberty and toward the enslaving ideas of socialism. The
political history of the twentieth century in America was
written in the language of failure--conservative failure!
Since one area of concern to me is education, I will
note a few of Ron's comments in that area. He has
correctly stated that: "Free" public education is
relatively new in the South. Prior to the War for Southern
Independence, there were almost no 'free' public schools.
Many people think that this resulted in a high illiteracy
rate in the South prior to the war. But, in fact, at that
time the South's literacy rate (and educational level) was
almost as high as that of the North and major European
nations. Noted Southern historian Frank L. Owsley reported
that 'if college attendance is any test of an educated
people, the South had more educated men and women in
proportion to population than the North or any other part
of the world'."
He notes the founding of the government education
system in the North by the Unitarian, Horace Mann, and how
Mann wanted the educational system to be controlled and
paid for by the state rather than being private or
church-related. Ron noted a case in 1785 where Rev. Jeremy
Belknap argued before the New Hampshire General Court,
where he advocated "equal and compulsory education for
all, emphasizing that the children belong to the State and
not to the parents." Did you catch the date on that--1785?
Ron also commented on voucher systems and charter
schools, and while he feels these might be small steps in
the right direction, ultimately he feels they are bandaid
solutions and he says: "Actually these efforts are not so
much intended to 'ease the pain' as to pacify the
populace. These types of efforts are all that current
conservative 'leaders' can come up with because they are
trapped in the liberal/socialist political system."
And he observes, in conclusion: "Because living
Americans have never seen an educational system that is
not based on the socialist system, it is hard for some of
them even to comprehend an educational system based in
individual choice, where parents use their income to
purchase educational services. In many respects we are
like the citizens of the formed Soviet Union and its
Eastern European bloc nations, who grew up under socialism
and then one day their system was suddenly gone! They had
no idea on how to order their society--they had never been
free." Unfortunately, that describes where most Americans
are in regard to education.
There is a lot more to Ron's book and I can't begin to
cover it all in one article, but it is worth the read. It
was published by Pelican Publishing, 1000 Burmaster
Street, Gretna, Louisiana 70053. Their website is:
www.pelicanpub.com